|
From the Manse August 2003
[ Up ] [ Nov03 ] [ Oct03 ] [ Sep03 ] [ Aug03 ] [ July03 ] [ June03 ] [ May03 ] [ Apr03 ] [ Mar03 ] [ Feb03 ] [ Jan03 ]

As a church we are committed to upholding the
1689 Confession of
Faith. Our constitution says that elders of the church must
assent “to the system of doctrine
taught in the 1689 London Confession of Faith and the 1966 Affirmation
of Faith”. The opening lines of our trust-deed say
“The objects of the
Church are...to promote the Calvinistic Baptist faith as defined in the
1689 Baptist Confession of Faith in the town of Stockport..”
So
what is the “1689"? It’s a short
summary of Bible teaching. 32 chapters or 42 pages in my pocket
edition. Who wrote it, why, when?
The story starts in the 1640s when Charles 1st
and the Puritan-dominated Parliament were at war with one another.
The King and the Puritans disagreed on many things, but one thing they
shared - their dislike and suspicion of Baptists! Almost everyone
agreed that Baptists were a dangerous sect which ought to be suppressed.
This is what one Puritan wrote in 1642:
Of all heretics and
schismatics, the Anabaptists ought to be most carefully looked unto and
severely punished, if not utterly exterminated and banished out of the
Church and kingdom.. They flock in great multitudes to their Jordans,
and both sexes enter into the river, and are dipped after their manner
with a kind of spell, containing the heads of their erroneous tenets...
And as they defile our rivers with their impure washings, and our
pulpits with their false prophecies and fanatical enthusiasms, so the
presses sweat and groan under the load of their blasphemies..
It was in response to attacks like this that a group of
Calvinistic Baptist churches in London published in 1644 a summary of
the doctrines they taught. They wanted to show that, though they
viewed baptism differently from the mainstream Puritans,
their understanding of the doctrines of
salvation and the Christian life was absolutely in line with the
Protestant Reformers and the Puritans. Fifteen ministers
from seven churches signed this summary which is known as the
1644
Confession of Faith or the 1st London Confession of Faith.
Thirty-three years later, in
1677, a
second summary was drawn up. Nobody knows for sure who drafted
this document, but it had just the same goal as the 1st Confession - to
show that Calvinistic Baptists were faithful to the Bible and the
reformed faith. So instead of producing a completely new document,
the Baptist authors based it on the great Puritan confessions of faith
that already existed - the Westminster Confession (Presbyterian)
and the Savoy Confession (independent). They took these documents
and simply rewrote the sections dealing with baptism, the church, the
Lord’s Supper etc. Anyone who read through the new Baptist
confession alongside the older paedobaptist confessions, could see that
in all the great doctrines of God and the gospel, they were identical.
The
1677 confession was produced during a time of intense persecution and
could not be circulated openly. All that changed after the
Glorious Revolution
of 1688 when William of Orange with his wife Mary came to the
throne, and a new era of freedom dawned.
Calvinistic Baptists were among the first to take
advantage of the new freedom. In
1689, the
pastors of London churches sent out a letter to other churches
calling them to an Assembly to be held to
“to consider such things that may much tend to the honour of God, and
further the peace, well-being, establishment at present, as also the
future comfort of the churches”.
The Assembly met as planned for a week of discussions and
prayer. More than one hundred Baptist churches in England and
Wales sent representatives. One of the most vital decisions they
took was to publish the 1677 Confession. That is why it is known
as the
1689 Confession of
Faith or the 2nd London Confession.
Today,
churches all across the world know and love that confession, drawn up
more than three hundred years ago, amid the fires of persecution.
Churches in North and South America, South Africa, New Zealand are glad
to call themselves “1689 churches”.
I know of churches in Fiji, Yugoslavia, Madagascar, Poland, Malta which
hold to the 1689 Confession. When we agreed that as a church we
would uphold the 1689, we were associating ourselves with other churches
across the centuries and across the world.
The
1689 is a wonderful summary of Christian doctrine. Of course the
English in which it was written now sounds old-fashioned and can be hard
to understand. But it’s been rewritten in modern English (A
Faith to Confess: The Baptist Confession of Faith of 1689, rewritten in
Modern English; Carey Publications; 1975 and many editions since).
Like any human document it isn’t perfect. There are places
where I would want to tighten up the language to bring it closer to the
exact wording of Scripture. For example, in chapter 6, the
Confession tells us that Adam and Eve
were
“the root..and standing in the room and
stead of all mankind” so that
“the guilt of the sin was imputed...to all their posterity”.
It would be more biblical to say that Adam
alone stood in the place of mankind and the guilt of
his sin was imputed to all his
descendants. In chapter 26, the Pope is called “the
Antichrist”. I think it would be better to say
“an Antichrist”. There are
perhaps half a dozen places where I would want to rephrase the
Confession.
But these are minor blemishes. Overall, the
Confession is a wonderfully clear, systematic, succinct, moving summary
of Christian faith. And it’s so contemporary. Although it was
written so long ago, very often you’ll find it deals so helpfully with
the most up to date issues. How about this as a response to the
claims of charismatic prophets and tongue-speakers?
“..the merciful Lord from time to time
and in a variety of ways has revealed Himself, and made known His will
to His church... He caused this revelation of Himself and his will to be
written down in all its fullness. And as the manner in which God
formerly revealed His will has long ceased, the Holy Scripture becomes
absolutely essential to men... The sum total of God’s revelation
concerning all things essential to his own glory, and to the salvation
and faith and life of men, is either explicitly set down or implicitly
contained in the Holy Scripture. Nothing, whether a supposed
revelation of the Spirit, or man’s traditions, is ever to be added to
Scripture”.
We don’t suggest that every Christian should be able to
agree to every statement in the Confession in order to join this church.
We wouldn’t expect very young believers, just converted, to have
digested all the meaty doctrines it contains. But we do hope that
as the years go by, members of the church will spend time getting to
know the Confession, studying it, chapter at a time, perhaps memorising
sections which they find especially helpful. We want children and
young people growing up in the church to be familiar with its teaching.
One of the reasons the churches that met in 1689 agreed to publish the
Confession, was that they hoped families would use it to teach the
young. “May not the gross ignorance and
instability of many... be justly charged upon their parents and masters,
who have not trained them up in the way wherein they ought to walk..”.
B. B. Warfield, the great evangelical theologian of the
19th century, believed that
the great creeds and confessions “have
in them more food for your spiritual life - are more directly, richly,
and evangelically devotional - than any other book, apart from the
Bible, in existence”. I think he was right. And I
think the 1689 is one of the richest of them all. Any Christian
who reads and studies it will find his faith strengthened and his
understanding sharpened.
It’s
a treasure. If you don’t have a copy, order one. Or ask me
to order one for you. Or download one from the internet. And then
don’t leave it to gather dust. It’s too rich a treasure to be left
forgotten on your bookshelves. It’s our confession. Make it
your own.
Original 1689:
www.grace.org.uk/faith/bc1689/1689bc00.html
Every
blessing to you all,
Stephen.
|