The complex
world of politics is one which we would normally believe to be more of an art
than a science. The Kurds with their limited political experience find it an
awesome task to ry to fathom this world of possibilities, intrigues and power
games. Most of our politicians, if not all, have no idea as to how probability
theory can give us a measure of what is likely to happen in tight
multi-factorial situations preferring instead to play guessing games and offer
unrealistic and unsound scenarios of possibilities based on personal
preference, fear and prejudice. In the modern science and technology of
politics, possibilities may be represented by what are called Truth Tables.
These are used to clarify, solve complex problems or predict events based on
empirical assessments and past experiences. A truth table is, therefore,
simply a table of possible outcomes against two-way values of Yes and No or 1
and 0 against each logical entity comprising the outcome or function being
evaluated.
The
following is a Truth Table showing the various possibilities (s) concerning
the Iraq/Kurdistan possibilities and the occurrence of each of the events
represented by the column headings. For example: State 1 is the situation
where The Events of Column 2 or (A) and Column 6 or (E) will be True while
none of the others will be True. In other words The Function represented by
State 1 may be expressed in Terms of Boolean Algebra as follows:
State 1 = A AND E AND NOT(B OR C OR D OR F OR G)
State 2 = B AND E AND NOT(A OR C OR D OR F OR G)
…
State 10= C
AND D AND NOT(A OR B OR E OR F OR G)
|
State |
Iraq Remaining as it is
with Sanctions (A) |
Iraq Remaining as it is
with Sanctions Removed (B) |
Regime changed (C) |
Kurds Retaken (D) |
Kurds Remain as they are at present (E) |
Federal Kurdish in a
Changed Iraq (F) |
Kurdistan Becomes Independent (G) |
|
1 |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
|
2 |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
|
3 |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
|
4 |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
|
5 |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
|
6 |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
|
7 |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
|
8 |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
|
9 |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
|
10 |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Truth Table 1. The States
In Truth
Table 1 there are 10 States. Each State will have its own conditions and
factors which we will assess in table 2 below.
To help
demonstrate the influence of Nations and/or Groups on the occurrence of a
State, Truth Table 2 is shown below where the columns are headed with the
possible State of Affairs, the rows are marked with the names of the nations
or groups involved in the decision-making/influencing process which affect the
occurrence or otherwise of that State and the last row but one represents the
total points scored for each State, made up of the sum of the weighting
figures for each nation or group influencing positively the outcome to be
realised. A YES in a column
indicates that the nation or group adds the value to the sum of the weighting
in full to the likelihood of the realisation of that State, in the last row
but-one of the table. A Yes/No
entry has a value of only half the associated weighting and a NO
entry will add a weighting of zero.
Those
decision makers who are usually of similar inclination are colour coded and
the total points they muster are added up at the bottom of the table to
indicate their combined influence on the political arena.
For the
purposes of illustration only I have devised a system of weighting based on my
experience of how a particular nation or group of nations would react to the
Iraq/Kurdistan situation and the importance of the nation or group and its
influence on the decision-making process in world politics vis-à-vis Iraq and
the problems of the Middle East in general. The results of Truth Table 2,
demonstrate the likelihood of each State on that basis and indicate the most
likely ones to be States 5 and 10 respectively. These are:
· State 5: A Federal Kurdistan within a New Iraqi System or,
·
State 10: A New fully integrated Iraq with
Kurdistan taken back under the wing of the new Government
It must be
noted that Nations, Groups and Blocks do not necessarily share the same views
or inclinations vis-à-vis every situation in the world. Therefore, we must
re-populate these tables using different weightings for every different
political test.
What if we
wanted to see the likelihood of only the States which would indicate the
possibilities of a Federal or Independent Kurdistan? Those states are :
Kurdish
Gains = State 3 OR State 5 OR State 6 OR State 7.
Which
equals :
B AND G AND
NOT(A OR C OR D OR E OR F) OR C AND F AND NOT(A OR B OR D OR E OR G) OR C AND
G AND NOT(A OR B OR D OR E OR F) OR A AND G AND NOT(B OR C OR D OR E OR F)
Optimising
the above expression will produce a much shorter expression:
NOT(D+E).(NOT(A+B).C.(F*G)+NOT(E+F).G.(A*B))
Where “*” is the Exclusive OR operator, “.” Is the Logic AND, and “+” is the Logic OR. The Exclusive OR expression, A*B is equivalent to A.NOT(B) + B.NOT(
1 No Change in Iraq or Kurdistan
2 Sanctions removed and no Change in Iraq or Kurdistan
3 Sanctions removed and Kurdistan gains independence
4 Saddam overthrown but Kurdistan remains as it is
5 Saddam overthrown and Kurds becomes a Federal
6 Saddam overthrown and Kurdistan gains Independence
7 No Change in Iraq and Kurdistan gains Independence
8 No Change in Iraq but Saddam retakes Kurdistan
9 Sanctions removed and Saddam retakes Kurdistan
10
Saddam is removed and Kurdistan retaken by
new Government
|
|
Weighting |
State 1 |
State 2 |
State 3 |
State 4 |
State 5 |
State 6 |
State 7 |
State 8 |
State 9 |
State 10 |
|
The
Americans |
100 |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes/No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
|
The
British |
100 |
No |
No |
No |
Yes/No |
Yes/No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
|
Iraqi
Opposition |
10 |
No |
No |
No |
Yes/No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
|
The
Arabs |
30 |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes/No |
|
Iran |
10 |
No |
Yes/No |
No |
Yes/No |
Yes/No |
No |
Yes/No |
Yes/No |
Yes/No |
Yes |
|
Turkey |
50 |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes/No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Syria |
10 |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
The
EEC |
100 |
No |
Yes/no |
Yes/No |
Yes/No |
Yes |
Yes/No |
Yes/No |
No |
No |
No |
|
The
Russians |
40 |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes/No |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Israel |
50 |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes/No |
No |
No |
Yes |
|
India |
20 |
Yes/No |
Yes/No |
No |
Yes/No |
Yes/No |
No |
No |
Yes/No |
Yes |
Yes |
|
South
East Asia |
30 |
Yes/No |
Yes/No |
Yes/No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes/No |
Yes/No |
Yes/No |
Yes/No |
|
South
America |
20 |
Yes/No |
Yes/No |
Yes/No |
Yes/No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes/No |
Yes/No |
Yes/No |
Yes/No |
|
The
Islamic World |
30 |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
China |
30 |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
African
Countries |
30 |
No |
Yes |
Yes/No |
Yes/No |
Yes/No |
Yes/No |
Yes/No |
Yes/No |
Yes/No |
Yes/No |
|
Kurdish
Proplr’s National
Struggle. |
50 |
Yes/No |
Yes/No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
|
Performance
of Kurdish Leadership |
50 |
Yes/No |
Yes/no |
Yes/No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
|
Total |
440 |
Western |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
100 |
Arab |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
60 |
Neutral |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
60 |
Special |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
100 |
Kurdish |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|