If I write this book loaded with new conceptual philosophy science will simply refuse to believe their merit, even without evaluating their possible potential. If, alternatively I write it up from a more academic angle, the average, every day man and woman in the street will not comprehend its wider text. That old philosophy about being damned if you do and damned if you don't torments me, therefore, as I appreciate the general public to be far more forgiving than any hallowed hall, haunted by its academics, I thought I would deliver its content to a larger audience and write it for the public as a whole, even though I realise the difficulty in establishing its content.

And so, I would ask you to wait until you have completed the book before you make an informed decision about its multitude of different explanations and to what surrounds them: Reserve your judgement till later and if uncertain at that point view it with ambivalence.

At this point, you might wonder what my qualifications are for writing this thesis, and I can tell you now, absolutely none!, except for a passion to learn, to discover and push the boundaries of philosophy to the periphery. Like those who contested established academic philosophy and knowledge throughout history, I to believe its the work that matters, not regurgitated ideas from university. The base of any philosophy should be judged on its merits, not the qualifications someone holds.

Therefore the two most important parts of this book, the Nothingness and the rewrite of Special Relativity will contain measurable prediction. Science will be able to either dismiss or prove what I say with large radio telescopes, and personally, I don't believe you can have a better qualification than that!