Lib Dem Candidates Back O2H Campaign and Observer
Petition
Michael Green, the Liberal Democrat PPC for St Albans,
and Hannah Hedges, the recently-selected Liberal
Democrat PPC for Hitchin and Harpenden, are backing
the Observer’s petition in favour of a new hospital
close to St. Albans.
“The new hospital will represent a significant
improvement in hospital provision in the area,” said
Miss Hedges. “The Hatfield site envisaged by Option 2
is good not only for the residents of Harpenden, St.
Albans and the surrounding villages but also for the
communities of Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire as a
whole. I would urge local residents to sign the
Observer’s petition and back the O2H campaign.”
Mr. Green added, “Cllr. Robert Donald and the Liberal
Democrats have campaigned long and hard firstly to
stop the downgrade of St. Albans City Hospital and
then to secure adequate replacement services in the
area. The site of the new hospital is not a party
political decision. Option 2 has gained all-party
support and is the choice of a large majority of local
residents. I will happily work with Labour and
Conservative politicians to ensure that the Government
is aware of the strength of local feeling.”
This item dated 20 April 2004 posted on the web site on 25 April 2004
Lib Dems Kick off Local Campaigning
St Albans Liberal Democrats will be kicking off their local
campaigning for District and European elections on Wednesday 21 April 2004
with a visit by House of Lords Transport Spokesperson Baroness
Ros Scott.
Baroness Scott will be talking to local activists about transport
problems in St Albans as well as joining in canvassing in one of
the wards that Liberal Democrats hope to win on 10 June.
Councillor Robert Donald, leader of the Lib Dem Council group,
said, “We expect to make significant gains based on our excellent
result in the Verulam Ward by-election”.
Baroness Scott will be joined by St Albans European Candidate
Chris White who, according to opinion poll data, is now close to
becoming a second Liberal Democrat European MP for the East of
England.
This item dated 18 April 2004 and posted on the web site on 25 April 2004
Lib Dems Triumph and Verulam By-Election
Liberal Democrat Sue Campbell scored a decisive
victory in a by-election for the Verulam Ward of St
Albans District Council on 5 April.
Sue won by 265 votes, and secured half of all the
votes cast. This is the second of the three Verulam
seats to be captured by Liberal Democrats from the
Conservatives in the last two years.
Winner Sue said, “I had a very warm welcome on the
doorstep and am looking forward to championing local
residents on St Albans Council.”
Expressing himself delighted with the result, leader
of the Lib Dems on St Albans Council, Councillor
Robert Donald said, “This is an excellent result and
shows that only the Liberal Democrats can defeat
Conservative candidates in St Albans.” Lib Dems now
have 24 out of 58 seats on the Council.
Local Lib Dem European Election candidate Cllr Chris
White said, “This shows we are well on course for more
good news in June when we fight Euro and local
elections.”
Commenting on Labour’s dismal performance, Michael
Green, Lib Dem prospective parliamentary candidate for
St Albans said, “With Labour pushed into fourth place,
the next general election looks promising for us. It
is difficult to see St Albans wanting to return a
Labour MP.”
This item dated 5 April 2004 posted on the web site on 25 April 2004
MP Condemned over Broken Promise
But Top-Up Fees Can Still be Stopped, Say Lib Dems
St. Albans MP Kerry Pollard has been condemned by the Liberal Democrats for breaking a clear election promise to the people of St. Albans by voting in favour of student top-up fees.
Commenting following tonight's House of Commons vote on the Government's Higher Education Bill, St. Albans Liberal Democrat Prospective Parliamentary Candidate Michael Green said:
"Two and a half years ago, Kerry Pollard was elected on an election manifesto specifically opposed to top-up fees¹. Now he has turned round and voted for them.
"Even Labour MPs say that the Government's proposals will create a two-tier higher education system, with the best universities filled mostly with the richest students². Having benefited from free universities themselves, Government ministers are now pulling up the ladder of opportunity behind them.
"No wonder so many people feel betrayed by Labour when they let them down and break their promises as blatantly as this.
"71 Labour MPs had the courage to stand by the policy they were elected on and join the Liberal Democrats in the voting lobby to oppose the Bill. If just three more had joined us this unfair and ill-judged Bill would have been defeated.
"Having passed its second reading the Bill is now likely to become law. However top-up fees will not be introduced until 2006 – after the next general election. That means that if the Liberal Democrats can defeat Kerry Pollard and just 2 other Labour MPs at the next election this proposal can still be reversed.
"Only the Liberal Democrats can be relied upon to oppose top-up fees. The Liberal Democrats are the only Party to have come up with a viable, sensible and costed alternative to this disgraceful policy.³"
¹ In their 2001 Manifesto Labour said: "We are against top up fees and have legislated to prevent them".
² For example: Top-up fees are "a really bad idea. [They would create] Real two-tier universities and the rich would pay extra fees and go to the classy, elitist universities, rather like the US." (Clare Short MP, The Independent, 18/11/02) "The Labour party has no business putting obstacles in the way of working class youngsters going on the very best courses if they can pass the exams and have the ability." (Nick Brown MP, 27/09/03) "Raising the price of intellectual aspiration will only reinforce its perception as a luxury of the few, rather than the right of all.’ (Ian Gibson MP, 16/09/03) "What we are doing here is setting up two tiers of universities" (Jeremy Corbyn MP, The Guardian 26/01/04)
³ Liberal Democrats would stop top-up fees, scrap existing tuition fees and bring in fair grants for poorer students. This would cost £2 billion a year. We would pay for it by taxing incomes over £100,000 a year at 50%. This would raise £4.7 billion a year. The remainder of the money would be spent on free personal care for the elderly, and on keeping down council tax.
This item posted on the web site on 1 February 2004